Distribution of exam points by tasks. Transfer of Unified State Exam points: Detailed description of the assessment system

Signs of pregnancy after embryo implantation

How many points are given for each Unified State Examination task in chemistry? Evaluation criteria for the Unified State Exam in Chemistry 2019: points and grades, conversion table, as well as the structure of the exam, testing methodology and main changes in the new year. In 2019, tasks for the Unified State Exam in chemistry began to contain a larger number of mathematical elements, calculations physical quantities, the testing of the basic theoretical course of chemistry also became deeper. At the same time, the number of tasks has decreased, now instead of 40 questions, the student will have to solve 35 (according to other sources, 34). Accordingly, the rating scale has changed; for the Unified State Examination in Chemistry 2019, the primary score has become lower – by 4 units.

All tasks are scored differently, and you can earn up to 5 points for difficult tasks. Therefore, to enter specialized universities, it is necessary to study the subject as deeply as possible.

Table of criteria for assessing USE 2019 tasks in chemistry, taking into account the new requirements:

Job number

Maximum score
35 3

Assessment of tasks is carried out according to an established methodology, while for complex tasks where logic is required, points are assigned using special analytical tables. If the answer best meets the requirements of the analysis, you can get up to 5 points for it. If the student has only partially developed the topic, the number of points is reduced. For an uncompleted task, 0 points are awarded.

Complex assignments are checked by two experts. If there is a strong discrepancy in scores, then a third specialist is involved. This ensures the most effective and objective assessment of graduates’ knowledge.

Conversion table for the Unified State Exam 2019 in chemistry from points to grades:

Number of points

Grade

The structure of the Unified State Examination tasks in chemistry in 2019 includes 29 questions with a short answer, as well as 5 with an extended answer.

The duration of the exam is 210 minutes; according to the standard, simple questions should take about 3 minutes, complex ones - up to 15. Regarding minimum score for admission to specialized universities, then each higher educational institution sets its own requirements. For example, to enter the Faculty of Chemistry of Moscow State University or the prestigious Moscow Medical University, you must score at least 50 points.

But usually the overall passing score for prestigious universities is 400-470 (at least less for the chemical department, more for the medical department), and admission to Moscow State University does not depend on chemistry alone, so if you don’t have enough points, you can get in mathematics, biology, Russian and internal entrance exams.

Significant changes in the Unified State Exam are also observed in other subjects.


To successfully pass chemistry, it is recommended to spend most of your time solving problems and equations. During the test, you can use a calculator, periodic table and salt solubility. The electrochemical voltage series of metals is also allowed.

The evaluation criteria for the Unified State Exam in Chemistry 2019 are described quite clearly in the regulations, but each graduate has the right to appeal.

Table of conversion of points to OGE-2019 grades in chemistry

Graduates of 9th grade have their own assessment criteria. According to all KIM and GIA, the maximum you can score is 34 points. But if a graduate wants to go to a medical college, a specialized class, or some other specialized secondary education related to chemistry, pharmacy and medicine, he needs to score 23 points or higher.

Chemistry score conversion table for OGE-2019

Despite its apparent simplicity, scoring 9 points for the minimum passing grade is not so easy. You need to be able to solve problems, navigate formulas, and have at least a minimal knowledge of theory. Those who pass with a bad grade will remain for the second year if they fail the retake.

Scoring table for assignments:

Job number

2 (1 – if partially resolved)

2 (1 – if partially resolved)

2 (1 – if 2/3 correct)

2 (1 – if 2/3 correct)

Many schoolchildren, to be on the safe side, start solving difficult tasks right away. If you solve them all without errors, you can score 19 points at once, that is, a “four”. However, this implies a complete solution to the task, otherwise it will be scored 1 point, or even not at all.

The assessment criteria for chemistry tests change every year, the rules become stricter, since there is an idea among the government that education is not of sufficient quality. This, of course, has no basis, because schoolchildren study worse not because of the program, but mostly because of overload.

Dynamics Unified State Exam results the history of 2018 in relation to the results of 2017 and 2016 is shown in the table below.

The table shows that the results of the 2018 exam are comparable to the results of the 2017 Unified State Examination. Apparently, this is due to the stabilization of the Unified State Examination exam model in history after 2016.

More detailed analytical and methodological Unified State Exam materials 2018 are available at the link.

Our website presents about 3,500 tasks for preparing for the Unified State Exam in history in 2018. The general outline of the examination work is presented below.

EXAM PLAN FOR THE USE IN HISTORY 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - advanced, V - high.

Content elements and activities tested

Task difficulty level

Maximum score for completing a task

Estimated task completion time (min.)
Task 1. From ancient times to the beginning of the 21st century. (history of Russia, history of foreign countries). Systematization of historical information (ability to determine the sequence of events)
Task 2. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Knowledge of dates (matching task)
Task 3. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century) Definition of terms (multiple choice)
Task 4. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century). Definition of the term according to several criteria
Task 5. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Knowledge of basic facts, processes, phenomena (task to establish correspondence)
Task 6. VIII – 1914 Work with a textual historical source (task to establish correspondence)
Task 7. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century) Systematization of historical information (multiple choice)
Task 8. 1941–1945 Knowledge of basic facts, processes, phenomena (task to fill in the gaps in sentences)
Task 9. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Knowledge of historical figures (matching task)
Task 10. 1914–2012 Working with a textual historical source (short answer in the form of a word, phrase)
Task 11. From ancient times to the beginning of the 21st century. (history of Russia, history of foreign countries). Systematization of historical information presented in various sign systems(table)
Task 12. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century). Working with text historical sources
Task 13.
Task 14. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century). Working with historical map(scheme)
Task 15.
Task 16. One of the periods studied in the course of Russian history (VIII - early XXI century) Working with a historical map (diagram)
Task 17. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Knowledge of basic facts, processes, phenomena of the history of Russian culture (task to establish correspondence)
Task 18.
Task 19. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Analysis of illustrative material
Task 20. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Characteristics of authorship, time, circumstances and purposes of creating the source
Task 21. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Ability to search for historical information in various types of sources
Task 22. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Ability to use the principles of structural-functional, temporal and spatial analysis when working with a source
Task 23. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Ability to use the principles of structural-functional, temporal and spatial analysis when considering facts, phenomena, processes (task-task)
Task 24. VIII – beginning of XXI century. Ability to use historical information for argumentation during the discussion
Task 25. VIII – beginning of XXI century. (three periods of the examinee’s choice) Historical essay

Correspondence between minimum raw scores and 2018 minimum test scores. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 2 to the order of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science. .

OFFICIAL SCALE 2019

THRESHOLD SCORE
The order of Rosobrnadzor established a minimum number of points confirming that exam participants have mastered the basic general education programs of secondary (full) education. general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard of secondary (complete) general education. HISTORY THRESHOLD: 9 primary points(32 test points).

EXAMINATION FORMS
You can download the forms in high quality at

The 2018-2019 academic year is ahead, which will be graduation for many Russian schoolchildren, who are already concerned about questions successful completion Unified State Exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how exam papers are checked in different subjects, how the scale for converting Unified State Exam points into grades works, and what innovations you can expect in 2019.

Principles for assessing work on the Unified State Exam 2019

Over the course of several recent years Unified State Exam system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to an optimal (in the opinion of the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the volume of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.

In 2018-2019, no fundamental changes are expected and it is safe to say that the same principles as in 2017-2018 will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates:

  1. automated verification of forms;
  2. involving experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does a computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination paper involves a short answer to the questions posed, which the Unified State Examination participant must enter on a special answer form.

Important! Before starting work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as incorrectly completed work will not pass the automated check.

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of a participant who filled out the form incorrectly, the result is considered unsatisfactory.

How do experts rate it?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full, detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with extensive work experience.

When checking the Unified State Exam, the teacher does not know (and even with a strong desire cannot find out) whose work is in front of him and in which city (region) it was written. Testing is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts’ opinions coincide, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the results of the check, the Unified State Examination participant is awarded a certain amount primary scores, which are then converted into text scores (scores for the entire test). Different subjects have different maximum primary points, depending on the number of tasks. But after giving the result according to the appropriate table, the Unified State Examination participant receives a final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to achieve the established minimum threshold of the primary score:

Minimum scores

primary

test

Russian language

Mathematics (profile)

Informatics

Social science

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

Based on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what grade? The 2018 online scale will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary Unified State Exam scores into test scores, which will also be relevant for the 2019 results. A convenient calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always concerned with the question of how quickly they can find out what result was obtained during the test and what the scale for converting the points scored on the Unified State Exam into traditional grades will be in 2019.

Teachers often take it upon themselves to reassure students by working through the tasks of the Unified State Examination tickets immediately after the exam and assessing the quality of the students’ work and the amount of initial points scored. Official results must be waited for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the Unified State Exam 2019. On average, organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

  • 3 days to check the work;
  • 5-6 days for processing information at the federal level;
  • 1 working day for approval of the results of the State Examination;
  • 3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these deadlines may be revised.

You can find out your owl score:

  • directly at your school;
  • on the portal check.ege.edu.ru;
  • on the website gosuslugi.ru.

Converting points to grades

Since 2009, Unified State Examination results are not included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system converting the Unified State Examination result into a grade on a school 5-point scale. As part of the entrance campaign, the test score obtained in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But many students are still interested in finding out how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points in each subject.

Estimates Using such a table is quite inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history by using the online calculator 4ege.ru, which also contains a scale for converting Unified State Exam scores, which is relevant for graduates of 2019.

Having received the Unified State Exam result, you should decide on a university as quickly as possible, comparing your capabilities with the real competition for the specialties you are interested in. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital’s universities even with high scores, because not only holders of 100-point Unified State Exam results, but also winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year will compete for places.


Starting in 2015, the exam has changed significantly compared to previous years. The Unified State Exam in Mathematics 2019 is divided into two separate exams: basic level and profile level. Each graduate has the right to choose the desired option. Or both at once. Just in case.)

Let's get acquainted with the innovations of the Unified State Exam?

Basic level of the Unified State Examination in mathematics 2019.

Appointment of the exam.

This is a relatively new exam. Designed for those who will not need mathematics in their further education. Either training is not offered at all, or it is offered in universities where the subject “Mathematics” is not included in the list of entrance examinations.

For any university with the subject "Mathematics" a document confirming passing the basic level of the Unified State Exam in mathematics is not suitable. Even if you passed it with an A.

Requirements for results.

The results of the basic Unified State Exam in mathematics are given on a five-point scale and are not converted to a hundred-point scale. Therefore, the right to a certificate is given by the usual three.

Task 4. To complete this task, you must be able to express a variable from a formula. It's a simple matter, but not everyone succeeds.)

Task 5. This assignment may contain very basic trigonometry examples. Or, equally simple examples with logarithms.

In tasks 6, 9, 11, 12, 14 you need to be able to obtain information from tables and graphs, solve basic everyday problems to choose from best option, etc. These competency-based tasks are not simpler (but not more difficult) at the basic level than at the specialized level.

Task 7. This task tests your ability to solve simple equations from a variety of topics. The equations can be linear, they can be quadratic, they can be exponential or logarithmic, they can be all sorts of things. They are united by one remarkable property - simplicity!) The very basics, without unnecessary complications. By the way, the very basics are explained using the links provided.

Task 8, 13, 15, 16- This is elementary geometry. From very primitive to simple.)

Task 10. Probability theory problem. About the same difficulty as in the profile exam.

Task 17. This is a number line assignment. Such tasks were not encountered at the profile level. But we met at the State Academic Inspectorate.) I must say that this task is not the simplest at the basic level.

Task 18. The ability to think and make logical conclusions is tested.

Task 19. Problem working with numbers.

Task 20. A text problem with a trick.

It should be noted that tasks 17 - 20 in the basic level more difficult short answer tasks at the profile level. Yes, yes! But the rest of the tasks will be easier.

Well, there is one more indisputable advantage of the basic Unified State Examination in mathematics 2018: there are no tasks with detailed solutions. There is no need to describe the progress of the solution and, therefore, all problems with the design disappear by themselves.)

The basics for solving tasks of the profile Unified State Examination in mathematics 2018 are posted in the relevant sections of this site. In the meantime, take note and remember these tips.

Practical tips:

1.Check your calculations carefully. Especially the short answer part. Especially if you haven’t had time to wean yourself off the calculator. The computer will not forgive the wrong answer, despite the ideal solution...

You need to check it correctly. Namely: solved the task, checked it, decide the next thing. And so a few examples. Maybe that's all. Then go back to the first one and check everything again! Checking one task several times in a row is ineffective. You will miss the mistake again and again. You need to refresh your view by checking other examples.

2. Do tasks with detailed solutions! They are so afraid that they don’t even read them. Don't be afraid! It definitely won't get any worse! These tasks can be done partially. If in tasks with a short answer points are given only for the correct answer, then in tasks with a detailed answer you can get points for an incomplete solution! You can get points even if you answer incorrectly!

3. If you are in doubt about how to formalize a decision, follow a simple rule: the course of the decision must be clear to the inspectors.

4. Do 3 simple advice on work on the Unified State Exam. This will save you from annoying punctures.

If you like this site...

By the way, I have a couple more interesting sites for you.)

You can practice solving examples and find out your level. Testing with instant verification. Let's learn - with interest!)

You can get acquainted with functions and derivatives.

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are essays based on the text. Today in test tasks it is necessary to either write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from those proposed (task 1 and 15), or name the numbers indicating the correct placement of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which the errors were made.

1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect answer

From 0 to 2 points

From 0 to 4 points

From 0 to 5 points

For correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23 the examinee
receives 1 point. For an incorrect answer or lack thereof, a penalty will be awarded.
0 points.

For completing tasks 1 and 15, you can score from 0 to 2 points.
The answer that contains all the numbers from the standard and those that are missing is considered correct.
other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer,
does not correspond to the standard; one of the numbers specified in the standard is missing
answer. In all other cases, 0 points are given.

For completing task 24, you can score from 0 to 4 points. Faithful


For completing task 7, you can score from 0 to 5 points. Faithful
the answer is considered to be one that contains all the numbers from the standard and lacks others
numbers. For each correctly specified digit corresponding to the number from
list, the examinee receives 1 point.

Maximum points

Minimum points

Essay evaluation criteria

Points

Formulation of source text problems

The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.

There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.

The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text.

Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments.

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on,

no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text.

The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on,

more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text,

another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on,

a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a commentary,

A large fragment of the source text is quoted as comments.

The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.

There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.

Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature).

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience),

conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature.

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life or reading experience.

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments,
OR

the examinee’s opinion is only formally stated (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”),

not reflected in the work at all.

SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY

Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation:

There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;

There are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work.

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation,

1 logical error was made,

There is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work.

The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent,

more than 1 logical error was made,

There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text.

Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech.

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts,

the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced,

the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech,

there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thought.

The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

LITERACY

Compliance with spelling standards

no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)

1-2 mistakes were made

more than 2-3 mistakes were made
more than 3 mistakes were made 0

Compliance with punctuation standards

no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)

1-2 mistakes were made

2-3 mistakes were made
more than 3 errors 0

Compliance with language norms

no grammatical errors

1-2 mistakes were made

more than 2 mistakes were made

Compliance with speech norms

no more than 1 speech error was made

2-3 mistakes were made

more than 3 mistakes were made

Compliance with ethical standards

there are no ethical errors in the work

ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)

Maintain factual accuracy in background material

there are no factual errors in the background material

there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material

Maximum points for an essay

When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for essays of 150–300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.

When counting words, both independent and functional parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” is one word, “five years” is two words).
If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.

When assessing an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 – there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 – there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made).

1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 – no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 – one to three mistakes were made;
K9 – no grammatical errors;
K10 – no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a retelling or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer... 62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points awarded by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.



Publications on the topic