Do you think you are Russian? Were you born in the USSR and think that you are Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian? No. This is wrong.

Are you actually Russian, Ukrainian or Belarusian? But do you think that you are a Jew?

Game? Wrong word. The right word"imprinting".

The newborn associates himself with those facial features that he observes immediately after birth. This natural mechanism is characteristic of most living creatures with vision.

Newborns in the USSR saw their mother for a minimum of feeding time during the first few days, and most of the time they saw the faces of the maternity hospital staff. By a strange coincidence, they were (and still are) mostly Jewish. The technique is wild in its essence and effectiveness.

Throughout your childhood, you wondered why you lived surrounded by strangers. The rare Jews on your way could do whatever they wanted with you, because you were drawn to them, and pushed others away. Yes, even now they can.

You cannot fix this - imprinting is one-time and for life. It’s difficult to understand; the instinct took shape when you were still very far from being able to formulate it. From that moment, no words or details were preserved. Only facial features remained in the depths of memory. Those traits that you consider to be your own.

3 comments

System and observer

Let's define a system as an object whose existence is beyond doubt.

An observer of a system is an object that is not part of the system it observes, that is, it determines its existence through factors independent of the system.

The observer, from the point of view of the system, is a source of chaos - both control actions and the consequences of observational measurements that do not have a cause-and-effect relationship with the system.

An internal observer is an object potentially accessible to the system in relation to which inversion of observation and control channels is possible.

An external observer is an object, even potentially unattainable for the system, located beyond the system’s event horizon (spatial and temporal).

Hypothesis No. 1. All Seeing Eye

Let's assume that our universe is a system and it has an external observer. Then observational measurements can occur, for example, with the help of “gravitational radiation” penetrating the universe from all sides from the outside. The cross section of the capture of “gravitational radiation” is proportional to the mass of the object, and the projection of the “shadow” from this capture onto another object is perceived as an attractive force. It will be proportional to the product of the masses of the objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them, which determines the density of the “shadow”.

The capture of “gravitational radiation” by an object increases its chaos and is perceived by us as the passage of time. An object opaque to “gravitational radiation”, the capture cross section of which is larger than its geometric size, looks like a black hole inside the universe.

Hypothesis No. 2. Inner Observer

It is possible that our universe is observing itself. For example, using pairs of quantum entangled particles separated in space as standards. Then the space between them is saturated with the probability of the existence of the process that generated these particles, reaching its maximum density at the intersection of the trajectories of these particles. The existence of these particles also means that there is no capture cross section on the trajectories of objects that is large enough to absorb these particles. The remaining assumptions remain the same as for the first hypothesis, except:

Passage of time

An outside observation of an object approaching the event horizon of a black hole, if the determining factor of time in the universe is an “external observer,” will slow down exactly twice—the shadow of the black hole will block exactly half of the possible trajectories of “gravitational radiation.” If the determining factor is the “internal observer,” then the shadow will block the entire trajectory of interaction and the flow of time for an object falling into a black hole will completely stop for a view from the outside.

It is also possible that these hypotheses can be combined in one proportion or another.

ST 9.4 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

1. Violation of the requirements of technical regulations, project documentation, mandatory requirements documents in the field of standardization or special requirements technical specifications or violation of the mandatory requirements for buildings and structures established by the authorized federal executive body before the entry into force of technical regulations during design, construction, reconstruction or major renovation capital construction projects, including when using building materials(products), -

entails a warning or the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of one thousand to two thousand rubles; for officials - from twenty thousand to thirty thousand rubles; for legal entities - from one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles.

2. Actions provided for in Part 1 of this article, which entailed a deviation from the design values ​​of the parameters of buildings and structures, affect the structural and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction projects and (or) their parts or the safety of building structures, sections of engineering support networks, or which resulted in harm to the life or health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, or which created a threat of harm to the life or health of citizens, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, -

entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of two thousand to four thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty thousand to thirty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from thirty-five thousand to forty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days; for legal entities - from three hundred thousand to six hundred thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days.

3. Repeated commission of an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of this article -

entails the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of four thousand to five thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty-five thousand to forty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from forty thousand to fifty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days; for legal entities - from seven hundred thousand to one million rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days.

Commentary to Art. 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

1. The object of the offenses provided for in the commented article are relations related to compliance with the requirements of project documentation, technical regulations, mandatory requirements of standards, building codes and regulations, etc. regulatory documents in the field of construction during construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects, including the use of building materials (products).

Legal regulation of relations in the field of construction is carried out in accordance with the following regulations legal acts: Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law of November 17, 1995 N 169-FZ "On architectural activities in Russian Federation"; Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation dated March 10, 2000 N 221 "On approval of the Rules for issuing permits for the construction of real estate objects of federal significance, as well as real estate objects in the territories of urban planning objects of special regulation of federal significance", dated March 5, 2007 N 145 "On the procedure for organizing and carrying out state examination of design documentation and the results of engineering surveys", Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia dated December 30, 2009 N 624 "On approval of the List of types of work for engineering surveys, for the preparation of design documentation, for construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects that affect safety of capital construction projects", other regulatory legal acts.

Federal law dated December 30, 2009 N 384-FZ “Technical Regulations on the Safety of Buildings and Structures” establishes general requirements for design documentation in the field of construction. The object of technical regulation in this Law is buildings and structures for any purpose (including the engineering support networks and engineering support systems included in them), as well as the design processes (including surveys), construction, and installation associated with buildings and structures , setup, operation and disposal (demolition).

2. The objective side of the offenses provided for in Part 1 of the commented article is non-compliance with the requirements of project documentation, technical regulations, mandatory requirements of standards, building codes and regulations, other regulatory documents in the field of construction during construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects, including use of building materials (products).

3. The objective side of the offenses provided for in Part 2 of the commented article consists of those specified in Part 1 of Art. 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation actions, but which entail a deviation from the design values ​​of the parameters of buildings and structures, affect the structural and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction projects and (or) their parts or the safety of building structures, sections of engineering support networks, or which caused damage harm to the life or health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, or which created a threat of harm to the life or health of citizens, the environment, life or health of animals and plants.

4. Part 3 art. 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation establishes administrative liability for the repeated commission of the specified administrative offense (within one year from the date of completion of the execution of the decision in the case).

5. In accordance with clause 2, part 1, art. 4.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, as a circumstance aggravating administrative liability, provides for the repeated commission of a homogeneous administrative offense, if for committing the first administrative offense the person has already been subjected to administrative punishment, for which the provisions provided for in Art. 4.6 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation term. It is necessary to keep in mind that an offense that has a single generic object of encroachment is considered homogeneous, regardless of whether administrative responsibility for the offenses committed is established in one or more articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (for example, committed by a person considered to be subject to administrative punishment for violating the Traffic Rules traffic, administrative offense in the field of road traffic) (clause 16 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 24, 2005 N 5 “On some issues that arise for the courts when applying the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences”).

By virtue of clause 2, part 1, art. 4.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, one of the circumstances aggravating administrative liability is the repeated commission of a homogeneous administrative offense, if for committing the first administrative offense the person has already been subjected to administrative punishment for which the period provided for in Art. 4.6 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

When applying this norm, courts should take into account that offenses are considered homogeneous, liability for the commission of which is provided for in one article of the Special Part of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (clause 19.1 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated 02.06.2004 N 10 “On some issues that arose in judicial practice when considering cases of administrative offenses").

6. The subjects of liability can be both citizens and officials as well as individual entrepreneurs and legal entities.

7. Cases of administrative offenses provided for in Parts 2 and 3 of the commented article are considered by judges in cases where the body or official who received the case about such an administrative offense transfers it to a judge for consideration (Part 2 of Article 23.1 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation).

If an administrative investigation is carried out in the case (Article 28.7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation), and an administrative penalty is provided in the form of administrative suspension of activities, then the case of an administrative offense is considered by the district court.

1. Violation of the requirements of technical regulations, design documentation, mandatory requirements of documents in the field of standardization or requirements of special technical conditions, or violation of the mandatory requirements for buildings and structures established by the authorized federal executive body before the entry into force of technical regulations during design, construction, reconstruction or major overhaul repair of capital construction projects, including the use of building materials (products), -

entails a warning or the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of one thousand to two thousand rubles; for officials - from twenty thousand to thirty thousand rubles; for legal entities - from one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles.

2. Actions provided for in Part 1 of this article, which entailed a deviation from the design values ​​of the parameters of buildings and structures, affect the structural and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction projects and (or) their parts or the safety of building structures, sections of engineering support networks, or which resulted in harm to the life or health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, or which created a threat of harm to the life or health of citizens, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, -

entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of two thousand to four thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty thousand to thirty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from thirty-five thousand to forty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days; for legal entities - from three hundred thousand to six hundred thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days.

3. Repeated commission of an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of this article -

entails the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of four thousand to five thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty-five thousand to forty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from forty thousand to fifty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days; for legal entities - from seven hundred thousand to one million rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days.

The provisions of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation are used in the following articles:

• Violation of the requirements of technical regulations by the manufacturer, performer (person performing the functions of a foreign manufacturer), seller
• Judges

  1.2. Cases of administrative offenses provided for in Articles 6.3, 8.1, 9.4, 9.5 and 9.5.1, Part 3 of Article 9.16, Article 14.44, Part 6 of Article 19.5, Parts 1, 2, 6 and 6.1 of Article 20.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation are considered by judges in cases if the case of such an administrative offense is initiated by an official of the State Corporation for atomic energy"Rosatom".

• Bodies exercising state construction supervision

  1. Bodies exercising state construction supervision consider cases of administrative offenses provided for in Articles 9.4, 9.5, Article 9.5.1 (in terms of administrative offenses committed by persons carrying out construction and reconstruction of capital construction projects), Part 3 of Article 9.16, Article 14.44 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

Judicial practice under Art. 9.4 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation appealing fines for violation of mandatory requirements in the field of construction and use of building materials

SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation E.N. Zarubina, having considered the complaint of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "" against the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court dated September 30, 2015 in case No. A40-90981/2015, resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court court of appeal dated 03.12.2015 and the resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dated 24.02.2016 on the same case,

installed:

The Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Administration of Civil Airports (Aerodromes)" (hereinafter referred to as the enterprise) appealed to the Arbitration Court of Moscow with an application to declare illegal and cancel the resolution of the Caucasus Directorate of the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision (hereinafter referred to as Rostekhnadzor, administrative body) dated 04/09/2015 N 06-G/7.5 on bringing the enterprise to administrative liability under Part 1 of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation), in the form of a fine in the amount of 300,000 rubles.
By decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court dated September 30, 2015, the application was rejected.
By the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated December 3, 2015, the decision of the first instance court was left unchanged.
The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, by its resolution dated February 24, 2016, left the judicial acts unchanged.
The Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Administration of Civil Airports (Airdromes)" appealed to Supreme Court of the Russian Federation with a complaint against judicial acts, citing incorrect application of the law.
Based on the results of the consideration of the complaint and the materials attached to it, no grounds for canceling the appealed judicial acts were established.
As follows from judicial acts, based on the results of an inspection of the capital construction project “Reconstruction of the airport perimeter fence” and equipping it with engineering and technical security means, as well as infrastructure facilities of JSC ““, carried out in order to monitor the execution of the order previously issued to the enterprise, numerous violations of the law were established on urban planning activities, including technical regulations and design documentation, reflected in the inspection report dated March 26, 2015.
Based on the identified offenses, the administrative body drew up a protocol on an administrative offense dated 03/26/2015 and issued a resolution dated 04/09/2015 N 06-G/7.5, by which the enterprise was brought to administrative liability under Part 1 of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation with the imposition of an administrative penalty in the form of a fine in in the amount of 300,000 rubles.
Having disagreed with this resolution, the company appealed to the arbitration court.
Part 1 of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation provides for administrative liability for violation of the requirements of technical regulations, design documentation, mandatory requirements of documents in the field of standardization or requirements of special technical conditions, or violation of the mandatory requirements for buildings and structures established by the authorized federal executive body before the entry into force of technical regulations during the design, construction, reconstruction or overhaul of capital construction projects, including the use of building materials (products), in the form of a warning or the imposition of an administrative fine on legal entities in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles.
According to Part 1 of Article 53 of the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, construction control is carried out during the construction, reconstruction, and major repairs of capital construction projects in order to verify the compliance of the work performed with design documentation, the requirements of technical regulations, the results of engineering surveys, and the requirements of the urban planning plan of the land plot.
In accordance with Part 3 of Article 52 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the person carrying out construction, reconstruction, major repairs of a capital construction project (hereinafter referred to as the person carrying out construction) may be the developer or an individual or legal entity engaged by the developer or technical customer on the basis of a contract. The person carrying out the construction organizes and coordinates the construction, reconstruction, and major repairs of a capital construction project, ensures compliance with the requirements of design documentation, technical regulations, and safety regulations in the process of these works and is responsible for the quality of the work performed and their compliance with the requirements of the design documentation. A person carrying out construction has the right to carry out certain types of work on construction, reconstruction, major repairs of a capital construction project independently and (or) with the involvement of other persons meeting these requirements.
Based on Part 6 of Article 52 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the person carrying out construction is obliged to carry out construction, reconstruction, major repairs of a capital construction project in accordance with the instructions of the developer or technical customer (in the case of construction, reconstruction, major repairs on the basis of a contract), design documentation, the requirements of the urban planning plan of the land plot, the requirements of technical regulations and at the same time ensure the safety of work for third parties and environment, compliance with labor safety requirements, safety of objects cultural heritage.
Having assessed the evidence presented in its totality and mutual connection, guided by the provisions of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law dated December 30, 2009 N 384-FZ “Technical Regulations on the Safety of Buildings and Structures”, the courts came to the conclusion that the enterprise’s construction of a capital facility construction in violation of the requirements of the design documentation constitutes an offense, liability for which is provided for in Part 1 of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The courts have not established any violations of the procedure for bringing to administrative liability; the statute of limitations for bringing to administrative liability has been met.
Taking into account the nature of the administrative offense committed, namely the commission of the offense repeatedly, the administrative body imposed an administrative penalty in the amount of 300,000 rubles within the sanction of Part 1 of Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
The arguments set out in the complaint were presented during the consideration of the case, were considered by the courts and the conclusions of the courts do not refute. The applicant’s disagreement with the assessment of evidence and with the interpretation by the courts of the norms of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and the legislation to be applied in the case does not indicate that the courts committed significant violations of the said Code and (or) the procedural requirements provided for by it, which did not allow comprehensive, review the case fully and objectively.
Since no violations of the rules of substantive and procedural law by the courts were established during the consideration of the case, there are no grounds for changing or canceling the appealed judicial acts.
Guided by articles 30.13 and 30.17 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences, the judge

Resolved:

the decision of the Arbitration Court of the city of Moscow dated 09.30.2015 in case No. A40-90981/2015, the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated 03.12.2015 and the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dated 02.24.2016 in the same case are left unchanged, and the complaint of the Federal State Unitary enterprises "" - without satisfaction.

Full text of Art. 9.4 Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation with comments. New current edition with additions for 2019. Legal advice on Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

1. Violation of the requirements of technical regulations, design documentation, mandatory requirements of documents in the field of standardization or requirements of special technical conditions, or violation of the mandatory requirements for buildings and structures established by the authorized federal executive body before the entry into force of technical regulations during design, construction, reconstruction or major overhaul repair of capital construction projects, including the use of building materials (products), -
entails a warning or the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of one thousand to two thousand rubles; for officials - from twenty thousand to thirty thousand rubles; for legal entities - from one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles.
2. Actions provided for in Part 1 of this article, which entailed a deviation from the design values ​​of the parameters of buildings and structures, affect the structural and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction projects and (or) their parts or the safety of building structures, sections of engineering support networks, or which resulted in harm to the life or health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, or which created a threat of harm to the life or health of citizens, the environment, life or health of animals and plants, -
entail the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of two thousand to four thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty thousand to thirty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from thirty-five thousand to forty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days; for legal entities - from three hundred thousand to six hundred thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to sixty days.

3. Repeated commission of an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of this article -
(Paragraph as amended, put into effect on September 1, 2013 by Federal Law of July 23, 2013 N 196-FZ.

entails the imposition of an administrative fine on citizens in the amount of four thousand to five thousand rubles; for officials - from thirty-five thousand to forty-five thousand rubles; for persons carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity - from forty thousand to fifty thousand rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days; for legal entities - from seven hundred thousand to one million rubles or administrative suspension of activities for a period of up to ninety days.

(Article as amended, put into effect on January 19, 2012 by Federal Law of July 18, 2011 N 237-FZ.

Commentary on Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

1. The purpose of this article is to ensure the safety of human life and health, environmental protection, and operational reliability of buildings, structures and structures being erected.

2. The object of the offenses provided for in this article are relations related to compliance with the requirements of project documentation, technical regulations, mandatory requirements of standards, building codes and regulations, other regulatory documents in the field of construction during construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects, including the use building materials (products).

3. Legal regulation of relations in the field of construction is carried out by the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law of November 17, 1995 N 169-FZ "On architectural activities in the Russian Federation", Rules for issuing permits for the construction of real estate of federal significance, as well as real estate in the territories objects of urban planning activity of special regulation of federal significance, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 10, 2000 N 221, Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 5, 2007 N 145 “On the procedure for organizing and conducting state examination of design documentation and engineering survey results” (as amended . and additional), as well as other regulatory legal acts in the field of urban planning activities. In accordance with Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated November 19, 2008 N 864, Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation dated December 30, 2009 N 624 (as amended and supplemented), the List of types of work on engineering surveys, preparation of design documentation, construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects, which affect the safety of capital construction projects (RG. 2010. April 20).

4. Federal Law of December 30, 2009 N 384-FZ "Technical Regulations for the Safety of Buildings and Structures", the scope of which extends to buildings and structures for any purpose and to all stages of the life cycle of a building or structure (Article 3), establishes the requirements related to ensuring all types of safety in the field of construction.

5. Executive authorities authorized in the field of state construction supervision, when establishing that products do not comply with the requirements of technical regulations and the absence of conditions at the construction industry enterprise that ensure the production of standard products, issue an order to the enterprise to prohibit the supply of products of this name until the deviations are eliminated.

In addition, in accordance with Art. 27.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, these bodies can temporarily prohibit the activities of an enterprise or production site, bearing in mind administrative punishment in the form of suspension of activities for up to 90 days (see commentary to Articles 3.12 and 27.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation).

6. The objective side of the offenses provided for in this article is non-compliance with the requirements of design documentation, technical regulations, mandatory requirements of standards, building codes and regulations, other regulatory documents in the field of construction during construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects, including the use of building materials (products).

7. Liability under Part 1 of the commented article occurs only in cases where the violation of the requirements of regulatory documents does not affect the design and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of capital construction projects and (or) their parts, as well as the safety of building structures, sections of engineering support networks . In other cases, liability arises under Part 2 of this article.

8. The subject of liability can be both citizens and officials, as well as individual entrepreneurs and legal entities.

9. The offenses provided for in this article are formal in nature and do not require the occurrence of harmful consequences.

10. From the subjective side, offenses are characterized only by intentional guilt.

11. Cases of administrative offenses are considered by officials of executive authorities authorized to carry out state construction supervision (Article 23.56), and if it is necessary to apply punishment in the form of administrative suspension of activities (Part 2 of Article 23.1) - by judges arbitration courts(about administrative offenses committed legal entities, and also individual entrepreneurs see para. 3 hours 3 tbsp. 23.1; see also art. 51 and others of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation).

Protocols on administrative offenses are drawn up by officials of the above bodies (Part 1 of Article 28.3).

Consultations and comments from lawyers on Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

If you still have questions regarding Article 9.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and you want to be sure of the relevance of the information provided, you can consult the lawyers of our website.

You can ask a question by phone or on the website. Initial consultations are held free of charge from 9:00 to 21:00 daily Moscow time. Questions received between 21:00 and 9:00 will be processed the next day.